![]() ![]() |
Nov 1 2009, 09:57 AM
|
|
|
|
Has anyone experienced fading from either of these brands that would require replacing?
And... preference for either or? Thanks |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 01:56 PM
|
|
|
|
SunTek HP Fades...
U guys serious? |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 02:03 PM
|
|
|
|
QUOTE (Solar-Shades @ Nov 3 2009, 01:56 PM) [*]726832[/*] SunTek HP Fades... U guys serious? yep....and starts to look like barney |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 02:06 PM
|
|
|
|
QUOTE (Solar-Shades @ Nov 3 2009, 01:56 PM) [*]726832[/*] SunTek HP Fades... U guys serious? Everything fades. |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2009, 02:16 PM
|
|
|
|
thats why carbon cost more and has a better warranty..because its better than HP.
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 11:37 AM
|
|
|
|
SunGard for us boys..
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2009, 03:06 PM
|
|
|
|
See ive been sold it as a non fading film.... Its only £2.50 more for the carbon...
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2009, 01:12 PM
|
|
|
|
I used Suntek carbon for about eight months and went back to llullu. Try the ATC line, I like it better and its cheeper.
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2009, 09:10 PM
|
|
|
|
suntek uses dye in the adhesive and the hardcoat. IT WILL FADE. Sungard is the same is it was years ago. (beware)
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 01:51 PM |
| © Copyright 1999-2009 TintDude.com | Contact tintdude@gmail.com |