Jump to content

SunTek HP Charcoal or Global Window Films HP Charcoal?


Guest C280

Recommended Posts

I use both (global supposedly rebranded in UK and sold via Anglian Technical Window Films)

Suntek better for shrinking, imo, looks wise I think when you tint a car 35 / 20 the global is a better match between the 2, Suntek does'nt match as well, again imo.

Bob

Link to comment
Guest darkdan

Global does have a 40%, which is about a 38%....38% is what most 35% films actually are.

All the suntek stuff I got when I used them was green. The carbon was green. The HP was green too.

I prefer the global qdp shrinkability.

benz2.jpg

Global QDP 30%

mm.jpg

QDP 40%

passatfx35_g6qdp40.jpg

G6 is done with QDP 40%

Link to comment

If you try global get the qdp instead of the hp. It looks better and a little easier to work with. qdp 40 reads 29% on the glass, just metered it the other day so im tintin darker than legal as it has to net 32 :lol6 . I do think suntek shrinks better though, but I may just not be adjusted to the global shrink yet.

Link to comment

Is the qdp a non reflective film ?

I find the non reflective films too thin, most are single ply and just :dunno to handle imo.

I agree the suntek is quite green in appearance. I tried the madico onyx yesterday (as recommended by naughty) found it shrank very similar to suntek, but looks more blue/grey in appearance, getting a sample of thier charcoal deep dyed to try, colour wise looks similar to suntek and its a bit more expensive.

Bob

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...