Llumar ATR vs Solar Gard HP Supreme

[mitchell]

Hi all,

 

I need someone sensible to offer some real world advice on films.

The car is used in a sunny, hot climate.

 

I'm looking between the Llumar ATR and the Solar Gard HP Supreme.

I've selected these on the basis that they are mid-range metallised, color-stable films.

Certainly the technical characteristics on paper are very similar.

 

I've discounted HP Charcoal on the basis that it's not color-stable, or at least not advertised as such.

I'm I'm mistaken, please correct me.

 

My main criteria is heat rejection and color-stability over time.

Some abrasion resistance would also be good.

 

Could someone more experienced offer some advice?

 

Thanks

 

Edited June 23, 2018 by mitchell

[quality tintz]

Use llumar better product....solar gard hp and supreme are junk and crappy scratch coats.... I used to use solar gard for years then it seemed like their quality went down a lot..

Edited June 23, 2018 by quality tintz

[DynamicATL]

Metalized film is pretty even across the board...I would go with the shop that has the highest quality installation/reputation.  If you are looking for heat rejection, I would skip HP and try Llumar CTX...roughly same TSER which a much higher IR Rejection.  Technically the HP will last longer in a harsh climate due to the metal, but that just depends on your area.

[mitchell]

Thank you both.

And yes, CTX is indeed the superior product.

[quality tintz]

3 hours ago, mitchell said:

Thank you both.

And yes, CTX is indeed the superior product.

Get the better CTX product you will be more happier