Rayno S-5 film longevity

[Cooltimes 5]

Ive been getting back warranties on rear windows in 2-3 years using rayno s-5.

This is not acceptable especially when rayno makes you jump threw hoops to get paid. I can just see all the warranties coming in this year.

at 150.00 max per car its going to be a tough year. 

Ive been hearing good things about global ceramic films. What can anyone tell me.

[Bham 3,486]

When I started getting burned the same way by ASWF crap, I did lots of research and found Global to be one of the best due to Garware being a core product company like Lulu.  Meaning they start from the beginning to make film, not the middle by adding laminate to someone else's core, like most of these failing companies like ASWcrap, FlexCrap, MaxProCrap, and RaynoCrap.  They either pass them selves off as a film maker when they are just laminators, or they rebox some cheap film in prettier boxes and call it theirs.  

 

Global is SOLID film.  Their 70% Ceramic is one of the best performing films "spectrally" across the board on the market.  Put it behind one of those expensive IR meters and see how well it performs.      It outperforms Lulu, BTW.  

You won't go wrong with Global in my opinion.  It's what I sling all day everyday.  

[brianhwang22 0]

s7 does the same crap. I used rayno solely for several years and got warranty requests starting only after 2 yrs. Rayno makes u jump through hoops to get store credit for the warranty and they do not want to cover all the windows that fail. 

[Tintman 0]

Here in Washington I've used Rayno for years and don't see very many claims at all at for my mobile window tinting business. Do you guys think its the film itself vs application technique or sun exposure?

[civicrice 12]

its crap tint.  In my opinion any film that can last at least 5 years is solid enough but 2 to 3 years is to soon. I've been using global for 10 years no problems.