Counterpart

On 08/04/2010 at 8:45 AM, VIP tint + glass said: a rep came in today. film made in Korea. Unifil? sounds like Nexfil 

I don't think there's any tint for skylights that last 5 years. Metallized will oxide and dark films will severely fade after one summer.

On 25/10/2018 at 11:40 AM, Long027 said:

Removed film from a freinds car and used no heat there was no adhesive what so ever left on the window. Is that just cheap film? Need some input. thanks guys!

Likely that it is Asian made 

On 8/30/2017 at 7:02 PM, opus said:

The rep from Rayno called me today pushing thier film, never heard of it before. I'm just looking for some feedback. He dumped some numbers on me.

 

RAYNO S9 35%	RAYNO S5 20%	Llumar ATC 20%	Llumar CTX 35
IR Rejection 92%	IR Rejection 53%	IR rejection N/A	IR rejection N/A%
TSER 58%	TSER 51%	TSER 39%	TSER 50%
$507.00/roll	$207.00/roll	$250.00/roll*	$450.00/roll*

 

 

Thanks!

50% discount at WFCT

9 hours ago, whitehog said:

 

Fat Cat, you didn’t come by and say hello to me at the SolarFX booth.

 

Sorry, my boss was with me.

Did u see Rick Tallman?

PPF is their last hope now.

You can contact Nexfil USA and asked about their Dynasty films

I think i just saw him at the WFCT yesterday.

On 5/16/2017 at 4:29 PM, DynamicAppearance said:

Just keep in mind the SolarGard Ultra Performance is not a Ceramic, it is a nanotechnology film.  Ultra Performance Plus is a Nano-Ceramic film, but only comes in 80%.  Based on the specs, I do question if that is Llumar AIR 80 reboxed.

No sir, the same chemical is supplied to various factories.

On 3/14/2017 at 5:44 PM, Sisqouc said:

Nice to know. My Rayno S9 is too new to tell.

S9 is cloudy.

If cost is not an issue, you can try bonwyke.

Suntek is garbage. Maybe go gets some garbage bags and throw some glue on.

in terms of product quality, go for Solargard

Let me use this comparison

Solargard HP vs Suntek HP

For the driver, Solargard HP has better heat reduction

For the tinter, if you try to heat shrink Suntek HP aggressively, you will find more issue with adhesive than Solargard HP.

A few years back I was privy to helping with a look into the complaints of film interference. The testing was performed on three different vehicles however, all three did not experience all interference listed below.

 

These were observed:

 

AM reception reduced to static with application of a dye-metal hybrid 35 or a Ceramic 30 when antenna was located on BG. This was a video feed at SEMA one year.

 

FM with dual antenna system designed to maintain reception even if a 18-wheeler pulled up next to you was reduced to single antenna capability with windows done in dye-metal hybrid.

 

Remote start was reduced to half its operational distance with an dye-metal hybrid 35.

 

GPS disrupted with dye-metal hybrid 35 when antenna is located beneath the rear deck.

 

Tire pressure sensor light lit up with dye-metal hybrid 35 installed to all windows.

 

Cell phone was not affected and Wi-Fi not tested.

WIFI is fine sir, except Apple's Hotspot

Even if the law-enforcers don't come after you, the insurers have every right to void your insurance during accidents because your illegal tints compromise driving-safety.

You may wish to consult Michael from Vision Tinting NSW

0414 566217

what no warranty?

 

http://nanotechfilms...rcial/clearsky/

No contact information too

- It claims to be from Japan

http://nanotechfilms.com/about-us

- However, that introduction is similar as ASWF

http://www.aswf.com/html/about/about.html

- The product description http://nanotechfilms.com/automotive-films/clearsky

is adapted from Johnson InsulatIR http://eclipsetintnm.com/auto-window-tinting/3189638

fat is sufficiently confused

who is selling to who?

 

The formula doesn't account for how a film's color (spectrum) impacts results.

 

Back when NC passed their net 35 law I was a film sales rep for the state and it was noted how Centaur (PT) auto film would squeak by light meter devices while ATR failed even if they both had the same VLT going on the same VLT glass. Centaur was a more bluish looking smoked film.

 

Important Point from Smartie.

In my earlier years, fat was sufficiently-confused because color has a part to play on the VLT reading on different test meters.

Outstanding!

 

Doesn't pay enough! Lol!

I don't know, it might could, are you hiring fat cat?

 

LOL, i am quitting soon.

In the past, fat has no ability

Now fat has no ambition

Man, you can be a good manny sales rep.

Reboxers = a tinter who buys cheap film and puts it in a more expensive film name box.

Coaters & Laminators (like Johnson, ASWF, XMC films) = converters

Scorpion, Aegis, Advantage, Maxpro, Geoshield, Protectgard, Unikorn, etc. = private label film supplied by major mfg'ers or converters to anyone who can afford to buy their own production run(s).

Toray = major polyester supplier to the window film industry