JWF -good and bad points

[Counterpart]

most people I see complaining about JWF are trying to compare it to film that cost 2 and 3 times what JWF costs.also I find their prices very fair.

Hahaha, yes sir. I suppose you are saying JWF is cheaper given the same quality =)

They are one of the oldest boys in our trade. I respect them for not ruining their supporters like what other big boys do.

[coast2coasttinting]

from what I understand JWF and 3M are the 2 oldest film manny's that are still owned by the founder of the company. Unlike Solargard, madico, and Lulu. Which have all been sold off one or more times.

[Counterpart]

fat favors the underdogs. They work harder.

[coast2coasttinting]

I have always been a fan of the underdog myself.

[Guest VaTinterPMan]

Love the Under Dog when it comes to Sports or Pretty much anything.....Only time I won't is if its something I'm standing behind or backing my Busy with...

[RockyDaz]

_{So no particular warranty issues then, the film lasts as well as anything else out there?}

_{In Australia they have also enjoyed a good rep, though never had much penetration into the market so its a bit difficult to find too many users here to ask.}

_{Their auto range seems a bit over-represented on the non metal side though???}

_{Marathon and Silhouette seem ok but insulatir is very pricey here}

_{I stock Daylight in their FG range but havent delved too much into the rest - any good ones to look out for??}

[Counterpart]

yes. Other than price (outside US), there is no such thing as a bad Johnson film (maybe bad tinter, hahaha). The same goes for madico. You hardly hear about people talking bad about these two.