Jump to content

Test of chemical resistance of PPF - 3M, Avery, KPMF, ORAFOL, XPEL and


Recommended Posts

Greetings.

In our current test we will check film chemical resistance. It is quite interesting because all manufacturers claimed that their films are resistant to aggressive chemical environments. Analogous to the previous tests, for this test we used the same 19 samples:

1. 3М VentureShield
2. Avery Dennison Nano Fusion
3. KPMF PPF 82205-UV
4. Orafol Oraguard 280
5. Xpel Xtreme
6. Xpel Ultimate
7. VentureShield 2007 YOM
8. Suntek PPF TC
9. Orafol Oraguard 283
10. KPMF PPF 82200
11. Hexis CarPro 150
12. Sharpline DuraShield+
13. Premium Shield SPF Elite
14. Hexis CarPro 300
15. ISEE2 Total Protect PU 250
16. Premium Shield SPF
17. VITO Irmen SPT 1365
18. VITO Irmen SPT 1164
19. VITO Irmen SPT 1265

All samples were marked with permanent marker and experience has shown that both acetone and “White spirit” are not able remove completely marks which were made by that marker.

all.jpg

As an aggressive chemical we chose “646 Solvent”.

post-1-0-84343900-1353223223_thumb.jpeg

646 Solvent is a chemical liquid used in the Russian Federation for dissolving paint and lacquers. It can corrode even the paint on the car.

Many of you probably will say that its way too strong, but for us it is does not matter – we want check it thoroughly because we should know for what we are plunking down our money.

 

Summary Table:

 

37.jpg


1. 3M Venture Shield
In the photos we took you can see 2 samples for comparison. In one of the photos “646 Solvent” was applied (in order to remove the marker writing) and the second one is a sample of completely new film.

post-1-0-37711600-1353223368_thumb.jpg

2. Avery Dennison Nano Fusion
In the photos we took you can see 2 samples for comparison. In one of the photos “646 Solvent” was applied (in order to remove the marker writing) and the second one is a sample of completely new film.

post-1-0-23921200-1353223512_thumb.jpg

3. KPMF PPF 82205-UV
In the photos we took you can see 2 samples for comparison. In one of the photos “646 Solvent” was applied (in order to remove the marker writing) and the second one is a sample of completely new film.

post-1-0-44096900-1353223738_thumb.jpg

4. Orafol Oraguard 280
In the photos we took you can see 2 samples for comparison. In one of the photos “646 Solvent” was applied (in order to remove the marker writing) and the second one is a sample of completely new film.

post-1-0-63965400-1353223901_thumb.jpg

5. Xpel Xtreme
In the photos we took you can see 2 samples for comparison. In one of the photos “646 Solvent” was applied (in order to remove the marker writing) and the second one is a sample of completely new film.

post-1-0-81977100-1353224011_thumb.jpg

6. Xpel Ultimate
In the photos we took you can see 2 samples for comparison. In one of the photos “646 Solvent” was applied (in order to remove the marker writing) and the second one is a sample of completely new film.

post-1-0-63965200-1353224153_thumb.jpg

7. VentureShield 2007 YOM.
In the photos we took you can see 2 samples for comparison. In one of the photos “646 Solvent” was applied (in order to remove the marker writing) and the second one is a sample of completely new film.

post-1-0-26933500-1353224401_thumb.jpg

Eventually, “646 Solvent” removed the marker from the all samples. Marks on such samples as Nano Fusion, KPMF 82205, ultimately were removed very easily, practically with one application. In contrast is such samples as 3M VentuteShield, Oraguard 280, Xtreme, VentureShield 2007 – with them we needed about 5-7 applications. We also noticed that the gloss had disappeared and the film had become dull. Furthermore, as you can see in the photos, both samples of VentureShield have shown film delamination. It seemed to us that we had not tested these films thoroughly enough and, in addition to that, some of the samples did not show any reaction during the test. That’s why we decided to repeat the “646 Solvent” testing but in a more aggressive way – 2-3 solvent drops in the center of the sample and wait while it completely dries out.

post-1-0-61202300-1353224518_thumb.jpg

1.2. 3M Venture Shield
In the photos you can see the sample with the solvent freshly applied and 2 other samples for comparison – one with “646 Solvent” completely dry and the other is completely new film.

post-1-0-53859300-1353224749_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-26645500-1353224750_thumb.jpg

2.2. Avery Dennison Nano Fusion
In the photos you can see the sample with the solvent freshly applied and 2 other samples for comparison – one with “646 Solvent” completely dry and the other is completely new film.

post-1-0-23511500-1353224849_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-84861200-1353224849_thumb.jpg

3.2. KPMF PPF 82205-UV
In the photos you can see the sample with the solvent freshly applied and 2 other samples for comparison – one with “646 Solvent” completely dry and the other is completely new film.

post-1-0-85552700-1353224956_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-49182100-1353224957_thumb.jpg

4.2. Orafol Oraguard 280
In the photos you can see the sample with the solvent freshly applied and 2 other samples for comparison – one with “646 Solvent” completely dry and the other is completely new film.

post-1-0-06582600-1353225050_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-72803300-1353225050_thumb.jpg

5.2. Xpel Xtreme
In the photos you can see the sample with the solvent freshly applied and 2 other samples for comparison – one with “646 Solvent” completely dry and the other is completely new film.

post-1-0-21754400-1353225148_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-84202500-1353225148_thumb.jpg

6.2. Xpel Ultimate
In the photos you can see the sample with the solvent freshly applied and 2 other samples for comparison – one with “646 Solvent” completely dry and the other is completely new film.

post-1-0-87415600-1353225236_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-53219400-1353225237_thumb.jpg

7.2. VentureShield 2007 YOM
In the photos you can see the sample with the solvent freshly applied and 2 other samples for comparison – one with “646 Solvent” completely dry and the other is completely new film.

post-1-0-49650800-1353225341_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-16338700-1353225342_thumb.jpg

After testing was complete we tried light polishing in order to remove the dullness and some blotchiness caused by application of the solvent. Technically you can fix it with polishing (see the attached photos).

post-1-0-75746000-1353225472_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-01799600-1353225496_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-90286800-1353225494_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-03274800-1353225497_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-21907900-1353225503_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-04728400-1353225498_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-94950300-1353225500_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the photos we took you can see 2 samples for comparison. In one of the photos alcohol was applied (in order to remove the marker writing) and the second one is a sample of completely new film.

 

Suntek PPF TC

 

1.jpg

 

Orafol Oraguard 283

 

2.jpg

 

KPMF PPF 82200

 

3.jpg

 

Hexis CarPro 150

 

4.jpg

 

Sharpline DuraShield+

 

5.jpg

 

Premium Shield SPF Elite

 

6.jpg

 

Hexis CarPro 300

 

7.jpg

 

ISEE2 Total Protect PU 250

 

8.jpg

 

Premium Shield SPF

 

9.jpg

 

VITO Irmen SPT 1365

 

10.jpg

 

VITO Irmen SPT 1164

 

11.jpg

 

VITO Irmen SPT 1265

 

12.jpg

 

The photographs show a sample treated with 646 solvent in order to remove an inscription. For clarity, the first picture was taken at the right angle, whereas the second one at the patch of light.

 

Suntek PPF TC

 

13.jpg

 

14.jpg

 

 

Orafol Oraguard 283

 

15.jpg

16.jpg

 

 

KPMF PPF 82200

 

17.jpg

18.jpg

 

 

Hexis CarPro 150

 

19.jpg

20.jpg

 

Sharpline DuraShield+

 

21.jpg

22.jpg

 

Premium Shield SPF Elite

 

23.jpg

24.jpg

 

Hexis CarPro 300

 

25.jpg

26.jpg

 

ISEE2 Total Protect PU 250

 

27.jpg

28.jpg

 

Premium Shield SPF

 

29.jpg

30.jpg

 

VITO Irmen SPT 1365

 

31.jpg

32.jpg

 

VITO Irmen SPT 1164

 

33.jpg

34.jpg

 

VITO Irmen SPT 1265

 

35.jpg

36.jpg

 

Summary Table:

 

37.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest thatsnappyguy

The little that I have heard about the clearshield is that you must use a steamer during application while others do not. I would like to get into the ppf game but there are so many different films out there just like tint. I have no clue which way to turn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a video that should show you how we've tested samples of the top coats on the market. We believe it's a better visual considering its showing you exactly how we tested it. Pictures only tell you a portion of the story. Raw video doesn't hide anything.  Enjoy.

 

http://www.autovues.com/vue/raFd4elX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  •   Sponsored by
    signwarehouse

    martinmetalwork.com

    tinttek

    filmvinyldesigns

    ride wrap

    Conco

    Lexen

    tintwiz

    auto-precut.com

  • Activity Stream

    1. 3

      South facing window tint

    2. 3

      South facing window tint

    3. 0

      Sun Pro Glass Tinting is NOW HIRING experienced Installers

    4. 3

      South facing window tint

    5. 3

      South facing window tint

    6. 4

      Wet shrinking problems with certain windows

    7. 4

      Wet shrinking problems with certain windows

    8. 4

      Wet shrinking problems with certain windows

    9. 4

      Wet shrinking problems with certain windows

    10. 4

      Wet shrinking problems with certain windows

×
×
  • Create New...