Rayno?

[DynamicATL]

10 hours ago, Jkatfelix said:

Supposedly 3m was looking to sue rayno because of one of there films infringed the crystalline technology

 

I doubt it since the machine that makes Crystalline is $200 million and Crystalline did not start as a window film.  I am sure a Rayno friendly person told you that.

[Jkatfelix]

10 hours ago, DynamicAppearance said:

 

I doubt it since the machine that makes Crystalline is $200 million and Crystalline did not start as a window film.  I am sure a Rayno friendly person told you that.

We use 3m at work I work for dynamic auto images in socal...

[DynamicATL]

Ok 

[Midtown Houston]

On 9/17/2017 at 11:52 AM, DynamicAppearance said:

 

I doubt it since the machine that makes Crystalline is $200 million and Crystalline did not start as a window film.  I am sure a Rayno friendly person told you that.

Hahahhaha....Rayno is far from inventing a film to match Crystalline. Your phone and tv screen probably habe Crystalline on it. 

Edited September 19, 2017 by Midtown Houston

[Jkatfelix]

I honestly don't know...heard it from the grapevine

[vquestfilms.com]

Sangbo 

[Counterpart]

PPF is their last hope now.

[Counterpart]

On 8/30/2017 at 7:02 PM, opus said:

The rep from Rayno called me today pushing thier film, never heard of it before. I'm just looking for some feedback. He dumped some numbers on me.

 

RAYNO S9 35%	RAYNO S5 20%	Llumar ATC 20%	Llumar CTX 35
IR Rejection 92%	IR Rejection 53%	IR rejection N/A	IR rejection N/A%
TSER 58%	TSER 51%	TSER 39%	TSER 50%
$507.00/roll	$207.00/roll	$250.00/roll*	$450.00/roll*

 

 

Thanks!

 

50% discount at WFCT

[DynamicATL]

Not shocked considering the amount of people talking about dropping the film.

[jh812]

I'll be surprised if they're around another year. Good luck with all those warranties. Anyone that has trey tints representing them at the tint off is out if you ask me. 

Edited October 7, 2017 by jh812