Jump to content

Roach

Member
  • Posts

    20,293
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Roach

  1. 13 hours ago, Jsmitty24 said:

    but 1300 that stuff better block more than just heat

     

    Totally agree... there needs to be *some* justification for whatever price is charged. But.. that is such a wide range of things....  And if you are going to charge that much, you dang well better honor that job if there are issues that need to be addressed afterwards.

     

     

     

  2. On 8/18/2021 at 8:55 AM, Sterling said:

    You won't get superb glare reduction with a high VLT film. In my opinion it's not worth tackling glare issues with anything lighter than 25%.

     

    Could not agree more. Glare is a direct cause of light. Anything lighter then a 25% and glare isn't going to be touched. imo.

     

    Which then leads to #3 - internal glare at night. Anything on glass will generally increase the reflectivity. Some films more then others. Look for something in the 20-25% vlt range with the least internal ref. rate. Unfortunately, the darker to go, the more reflective films tend to be.

     

    It's all a balancing act. Ask to see samples.. Look at the samples both during the day and at night.

     

    In reality, how often are you looking out your windows at night for views?

  3. These were from Thursday. The blackout was to hide... climate control stuff??? Not really sure what it's called.. but it blows air down as people walk thru the doors... I assume to keep the cold or hot air from coming in. 

     

    The other was a 3M deco film.... 

     

    ETA: And yes, I would have done the other two panes in blackout to make them match, but I was doing as instructed. So..............  :dunno

     

     

     

     

    PXL_20210722_180155525 (002).jpg

    PXL_20210722_150456082 (002).jpg

  4. I have a lot of thoughts, mostly about nothing that has to do with the job itself, so I'll keep those to myself.

     

    I'll let others comment on the job, but imo, it's pretty bad.

     

    To make it easier for people to want to help you.....

     

    https://ibb.co/mDmXvCm

     

    https://ibb.co/B6cGTBX

     

    https://ibb.co/3mGhk9X

     

    https://ibb.co/fXM4n7f

     

    https://ibb.co/mvYRJh7

     

    https://ibb.co/sgS2NNk

     

    https://ibb.co/mSSBfLv

     

    https://ibb.co/wLg5NLB

     

    https://ibb.co/nQRLFcw

     

    https://ibb.co/ZNqJ5S1

     

    https://ibb.co/DfGyXVf

     

  5. I wish the govt would recommend film for pretty much everyone. :thumb

     

     

    The part I don't like in that article is: 

     

    Dr. Mahabir Bhandari, a member of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Building Envelope & Urban Systems Research Group, agreed that aluminum foil and cardboard are

    useful for cooling the home in emergency situations.

     

    Very misleading.

     

    Even window film doesn't cool the home. It blocks heat from entering into your home. 

     

    There's a big difference between the two. 

     

    Other then that, it made sense. lol 

     

     

     

  6. 18 minutes ago, Matthew1990 said:

    Why don't they make ceramic in the darker shades in flatglass?

     

    I'll refrain from adding my :twocents to the brakeage question... mostly due to not coming across it much at all. 

     

    As for a dark ceramic. My hypothesis is... generally speaking, ceramic films are not as reflective as normal duel-reflective films. That being the case, the darker you go, the more heat is going to be absorbed rather then reflected. Which at that point, you enter the range where it breaks.  Not sure if gas in the middle comes in to play with that... but I think it's more the glass being heated. 

     

    A silver film is opposite of what the ceramic films are meant to do. Do the job of window film w/o being shiny. So there would be no such thing as a 'silver ceramic' film. Total opposites. 

     

     

  7. 8 hours ago, noobtintguy said:

    Is there anything else that can help?

     

    No.

     

    8 hours ago, noobtintguy said:

    My window is dual-pane tempered glass

     

    If the windows actually are tempered, then you don't have to be concerned with solar absorbance of the films. Tempered glass is heat-strengthened already so it can take a ton of heat without breaking.

     

    8 hours ago, noobtintguy said:

    recommendations for creating more privacy

     

    Normal glass, generally, has about a 9% reflectivity rate. The DRN25 increases it to about 30%... the DRN35 is about 21%. So as you said, less reflective, which offers less privacy. 

     

    Generally, the darker the film, the more reflective it is, giving you more privacy. Lighter films = less reflective = less privacy.

     

    I looked up a 30% film from a different company just to check #s, and it was similar to the DRN35 specs. So those two films, the DRN25 & DRN35 will give you pretty much what you can expect in those shades. 

     

    Like everything in life, there are tradeoffs. So you gotta look at each and decide what is more important. Need more privacy - you are going to give up the amount of light that comes thru the windows. Want more light? Gonna give up privacy. 

     

    Unfortunately, that's just how it is. Whether you are looking for privacy, heat reduction, reducing fading, etc. 

     

     

    ETA: Moved this from the main forum... 

     

  8. 6 hours ago, Blackbeard601 said:

    How do you get air bubbles out?

     

    Use more water when applying the film to the window, and then press it out with your squeegee. If you don't use enough water, it's not going to push out properly. 

     

    As far as the types of windows to learn to tint on - they honestly are pretty good ones. They are big without being super big, and flat. Cars are much different... :thumb

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...