Jump to content

3M Prestige films

Guest darkdan

By Guest darkdan
in Window Tinting - General Discussion

Recommended Posts

tint_detective

tint_detective

Posted
Posted
The Presitge line is a little deceptive. The new TSER that they are using to get their better performing numbers are due to a system that is not recognized by the IWFA. If you use the system that is recognized by the IWFA (right angle) their numbers are not very good.

The number is used as a benchmark measurement. It is not intended to be compared to the suns angle. This is simply creative marketing.

Try using LLumar. We are a member of the IWFA.

[*]401581

Blade your metint clone has arrived :blah

[*]401584

:lol2

:dunno BBWWWAAHAHAHA

I ait, a baybay!!

Comb eer wee mon, I want ma baybee bauk, baybee bach........ddddribs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest willie

Guest willie

Posted
Posted
The Presitge line is a little deceptive. The new TSER that they are using to get their better performing numbers are due to a system that is not recognized by the IWFA. If you use the system that is recognized by the IWFA (right angle) their numbers are not very good.

The number is used as a benchmark measurement. It is not intended to be compared to the suns angle. This is simply creative marketing.

Try using LLumar. We are a member of the IWFA.

[*]401581

Blade your metint clone has arrived :blah

[*]401584

:blah

:lol2 BBWWWAAHAHAHA

I ait, a baybay!!

Comb eer wee mon, I want ma baybee bauk, baybee bach........ddddribs!

[*]401586

yo shady sherklock where your phucked up emotion or are you to busy smelling your finger :lol:blah:dunno

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest vclimber

Guest vclimber

Posted
Posted
The Presitge line is a little deceptive. The new TSER that they are using to get their better performing numbers are due to a system that is not recognized by the IWFA. If you use the system that is recognized by the IWFA (right angle) their numbers are not very good.

The number is used as a benchmark measurement. It is not intended to be compared to the suns angle. This is simply creative marketing.

Try using LLumar. We are a member of the IWFA.

[*]401581

Actually you should be more concerned with the NFRC since that is the orginization that gives the Energy Star Rating which is what the flat glass industry is trying to get recognized by.

It will get interesting once mfg's try to qualify their films for the Energy Star Rating which can get rebates for customers from the municipalities. All the marketing games will be over and only NFRC recognized standards will be used... :dunno

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tigerstripe

tigerstripe

Posted
Posted
The Presitge line is a little deceptive. The new TSER that they are using to get their better performing numbers are due to a system that is not recognized by the IWFA. If you use the system that is recognized by the IWFA (right angle) their numbers are not very good.

The number is used as a benchmark measurement. It is not intended to be compared to the suns angle. This is simply creative marketing.

Try using LLumar. We are a member of the IWFA.

[*]401581

Actually you should be more concerned with the NFRC since that is the orginization that gives the Energy Star Rating which is what the flat glass industry is trying to get recognized by.

It will get interesting once mfg's try to qualify their films for the Energy Star Rating which can get rebates for customers from the municipalities. All the marketing games will be over and only NFRC recognized standards will be used... :lol2

[*]401593

and dont forget teh skin cancer foundation :dunno

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest vclimber

Guest vclimber

Posted
Posted
The Presitge line is a little deceptive. The new TSER that they are using to get their better performing numbers are due to a system that is not recognized by the IWFA. If you use the system that is recognized by the IWFA (right angle) their numbers are not very good.

The number is used as a benchmark measurement. It is not intended to be compared to the suns angle. This is simply creative marketing.

Try using LLumar. We are a member of the IWFA.

[*]401581

Actually you should be more concerned with the NFRC since that is the orginization that gives the Energy Star Rating which is what the flat glass industry is trying to get recognized by.

It will get interesting once mfg's try to qualify their films for the Energy Star Rating which can get rebates for customers from the municipalities. All the marketing games will be over and only NFRC recognized standards will be used... :lol2

[*]401593

and dont forget teh skin cancer foundation :blah

[*]401635

Wht the heck are they gonna do? :dunno

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aliveandawake

aliveandawake

Posted
Posted
this thread is getting a bit out of hand..

[*]401670

Nope. Its a great discusion about some of the different films and there is a lot of information in this thread.

First of all, sorry you can't get the film, Dan. Is it volume or loyalty they demand?

The prestige film sounds like a decent film. To bad they lay the marketing on so thick.

VC's name is not Eric and he's not a distributor and is very wise in the ways of many films :dunno

And yes, the NFRC is going to be very importan in the near future. I know of a lot of flat glass installers the think the IWFA is for auto regulations only, but they, along with some of the manufactures are working hard on getting film recognozed. mmm might get the prestige approved for those near the equator, but not up here... :lol2

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest 01CLS

Guest 01CLS

Posted
Posted
The Presitge line is a little deceptive. The new TSER that they are using to get their better performing numbers are due to a system that is not recognized by the IWFA. If you use the system that is recognized by the IWFA (right angle) their numbers are not very good.

The number is used as a benchmark measurement. It is not intended to be compared to the suns angle. This is simply creative marketing.

Try using LLumar. We are a member of the IWFA.

[*]401581

Actually you should be more concerned with the NFRC since that is the orginization that gives the Energy Star Rating which is what the flat glass industry is trying to get recognized by.

It will get interesting once mfg's try to qualify their films for the Energy Star Rating which can get rebates for customers from the municipalities. All the marketing games will be over and only NFRC recognized standards will be used... :rollin

[*]401593

I know one film line that has that has that little logo on all its film viewers, and has been recognized.

and you are right VC

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tintseller

Tintseller

Posted
Posted

VC, You are very good. The NFRC is a major component and is very important. LLumar has received the Energy Star but is awaiting red tape to be certified to print the logo on our boxes and literature.

Actually you should be more concerned with the NFRC since that is the orginization that gives the Energy Star Rating which is what the flat glass industry is trying to get recognized by.

It will get interesting once mfg's try to qualify their films for the Energy Star Rating which can get rebates for customers from the municipalities. All the marketing games will be over and only NFRC recognized standards will be used... :DD

[*]401593

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...